# Monday, 12 January 2015
« IKVM.NET 8.0 Release Candidate 0 | Main | New Development Snapshot »
IKVM.NET 8.0 Release Candidate 1

The second release candidate is available. It can be downloaded here or from NuGet.

What's New (relative to rc 0):

  • Fixed build error when using Java 8u25 or newer.
  • Bug fix. Unsafe.compareAndSwapObject should resolve field before passing it to MakeTypedReference.
  • Implemented OperatingSystemMXBean.getFreePhysicalMemorySize and OperatingSystemMXBean.getTotalPhysicalMemorySize.

Binaries available here: ikvmbin-8.0.5449.1.zip

Sources: ikvmsrc-8.0.5449.1.zip, openjdk-8-b132-stripped.zip

Monday, 12 January 2015 15:11:00 (W. Europe Standard Time, UTC+01:00)  #    Comments [4]
Saturday, 17 January 2015 21:54:27 (W. Europe Standard Time, UTC+01:00)
Thank you for all the hard work you have put into IKVM!
Sunday, 01 February 2015 23:45:56 (W. Europe Standard Time, UTC+01:00)
Great stuff, keep it up!
Thursday, 05 February 2015 18:17:03 (W. Europe Standard Time, UTC+01:00)
We use IKVM.NET in production daily to call a 3rd party vendor's Java library from C#. The vendor has a .NET version of the library, but the IKVMC'd version performs much, much better. Thanks for all your hard work!!
Jonathan Marston
Monday, 09 February 2015 00:35:30 (W. Europe Standard Time, UTC+01:00)
Hi, Thanks for such an excellent project.
I want to ask if you have plans to support JavaFX, since it is part of openjdk8 by default.

IKVM.NET 8.0 Release Candidate 1 seems it does not support javafx, since javafx is intended to be the java main UI toolkit, it would be great if you consider adding it it IKVM.

Thanks in advance.
Home page

I apologize for the lameness of this, but the comment spam was driving me nuts. In order to be able to post a comment, you need to answer a simple question. Hopefully this question is easy enough not to annoy serious commenters, but hard enough to keep the spammers away.

Anti-Spam Question: What method on java.lang.System returns an object's original hashcode (i.e. the one that would be returned by java.lang.Object.hashCode() if it wasn't overridden)? (case is significant)

Comment (HTML not allowed)  

Live Comment Preview