# Tuesday, 12 August 2008
« Reflection.Emit Bug | Main | Cecil Conclusion »
Using Mono.Cecil instead of Reflection.Emit in IKVMC

I prototyped a Reflection.Emit layer for Mono.Cecil and integrated it with ikvmc. Preliminary results:

  • It looks like it is feasible to replace "using System.Reflection.Emit;" with "using Cecil.Reflection.Emit;" and only require a handful of "#if CECIL"s sprinkled through the code.
  • Mono.Cecil is lacking some functionality required by ikvmc (global methods, multi module assemblies, support for calli signatures [AFAICT], support for byte[] arguments in custom attributes)
  • Given the architecture of Mono.Cecil I'm worried that it will perform worse than Reflection.Emit (which, on .NET, is already pretty slow).

I'm pretty sure there are more issues waiting to be discovered, but these I found while trying to compile a relatively simple .class file. I got it to generate a verifiable assembly using the following ikvmc command:

        ikvmc test.class -target:library -nostacktraceinfo

If you want to play along, the Cecil.Reflection.Emit layer plus the ikvmc patch (relative to current cvs) can be found here.

At this point I'm not sure what's next. I don't feel working on Mono.Cecil is the best use of my time. I may have to put the multi assembly feature of ikvmc on the back burner (which also means no progress in splitting up IKVM.OpenJDK.ClassLibrary.dll).

On a more possitive note, doing this work made me realize that ConstructorBuilder is a useless annoyance and I can simplify some ikvm code by only using MethodBuilder (it turns out that DefineMethod can also be used to define a constructor).

Well, I will be able to do this once Mono's DefineMethod is fixed so that it notices that a constructor is created and not insert another default constructor.

Update: Zoltan already fixed the Mono bug. Thanks!

Update 2: Jb Evain pointed out that global methods are supported (simply add the methods to the <Module> type) and that calli is supported via Mono.Cecil.CallSite.

Tuesday, 12 August 2008 17:39:21 (W. Europe Daylight Time, UTC+02:00)  #    Comments [0]
Name
E-mail
Home page

I apologize for the lameness of this, but the comment spam was driving me nuts. In order to be able to post a comment, you need to answer a simple question. Hopefully this question is easy enough not to annoy serious commenters, but hard enough to keep the spammers away.

Anti-Spam Question: What method on java.lang.System returns an object's original hashcode (i.e. the one that would be returned by java.lang.Object.hashCode() if it wasn't overridden)? (case is significant)

Answer:  
Comment (HTML not allowed)  

Live Comment Preview